Web5 Apr 2024 · Clarence Thomas floats the argument that Section 230 violates the First Amendment Change would require them to host conservatives and others who've been banned--like Trump. Claire Goforth Web5 Apr 2024 · In it, Thomas took broad aim at social media networks, attacking Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the landmark law that protects technology …
Clarence Thomas Wants to Rethink Internet Speech. Be Afraid
Web16 Oct 2024 · Thomas would like to see the Supreme Court interpret Section 230 in the “textualist” way he favors, hence his invitation to plaintiffs to challenge it so that he, … Web14 Oct 2024 · Analysis US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has unexpectedly weighed in on the debate over internet giants' legal protections from the consequences of … いわき fc j2 ライセンス
Fact check: Post misrepresents Justice Thomas on Section 230
Web8 hours ago · At least one member of the Supreme Court told Justice Clarence Thomas that there was no problem accepting privately paid luxury trips and other lavish gifts from “close personal friends” without ... Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230. New York Post (News) News. Supreme Court deadlocked on enacting ... WebThis conflicts with federal laws that protect freedom of speech, including Section 230, Pinsof says, and would likely not be enforceable. Yet platforms may not be able to rely on Section 230 protecting them forever. A case in the Supreme Court argues that tech companies can in fact be held liable for content promoted on their platforms. Web7 Apr 2024 · The Court appeared wary of taking serious action against Section 230, the politically contentious law that largely shields companies from liability for harmful posts—but whatever ruling it makes ... いわき fc j3 優勝